Effectiveness of Mckenzie’s Exercises and Intensive Spinal Strengthening Program on Patients with Subacute or Chronic Low Back Pain- A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Ashis Kumar Deo Physiotherapist cum Manager, Occupational Health Center, Tata Steel, Kalinganagar, Odisha
  • Priyabrata Dash Vice Principal cum Associate Professor, KIMS School of Physiotherapy, KIMS, KIIT DU, Bhubaneshwar
  • Jagatjoy Sharma Physiotherapist, District Early Intervention Centre, City hospital, Ganjam
  • Amitav Nayak Senior Physiotherapist cum Deputy Director Administration, KIMS School of Physiotherapy, KIMS, KIIT-DU, Bhubaneswar
  • Smruti Ranjan Sahu Assistant Professor, KIMS School of Physiotherapy, KIMS, KIIT DU, Bhubaneshwar
  • Bhagyalaxmi Jena Physiotherapist, KIMS School of Physiotherapy, KIMS, KIIT DU, Bhubaneshwar
  • Dwarikanath Rout Assistant Professor, KIMS School of Physiotherapy, KIMS, KIIT DU, Bhubaneshwar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmsdr.v9i3.1061

Keywords:

Low back pain

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder affecting a significant portion of the global population, with chronic cases leading to prolonged disability. McKenzie exercises and intensive spinal strengthening programs are commonly used interventions, but their comparative effectiveness remains debated. 

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of McKenzie exercises versus intensive spinal strengthening exercises in reducing pain and disability in patients with subacute or chronic LBP when combined with conventional therapy (interferential therapy and traction). 

Methods: A randomized comparative study was conducted with 60 participants (aged 30–50 years) divided into two groups. Group A received McKenzie exercises, intermittent lumbar traction, and interferential therapy (IFT), while Group B received intensive spinal strengthening exercises, traction, and IFT. Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and disability was assessed via the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Outcomes were evaluated before and after a 4-week intervention. 

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in pain and disability (p = 0.001). However, Group A (McKenzie) demonstrated greater reductions in pain (mean decrease from 8.0 to 3.0 on VAS) and disability (60% to 22%) compared to Group B (pain: 8.0 to 5.0; disability: 55.5% to 34%). Intergroup analysis revealed McKenzie exercises were significantly more effective (p = 0.002). 

Conclusion: McKenzie exercises combined with conventional therapy are more effective than intensive spinal strengthening programs in alleviating pain and improving functional outcomes in subacute/chronic LBP patients. Further studies with larger samples and longer durations are recommended to validate these findings. 

Keywords: Low back pain, McKenzie method, spinal strengthening exercises, interferential therapy, lumbar traction, disability management.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-15

How to Cite

Deo, A. K., Dash, P., Sharma, J., Nayak , A., Sahu, S. R., Jena , B., & Rout , D. (2025). Effectiveness of Mckenzie’s Exercises and Intensive Spinal Strengthening Program on Patients with Subacute or Chronic Low Back Pain- A Comparative Study. International Journal of Medical Science And Diagnosis Research, 9(3), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmsdr.v9i3.1061

Issue

Section

Articles